Click here to view in your browser.
|
Dedicated
to the sovereignty |
---|
Missouri Second Amendment Preservation Act Please write him an old fashion letter (more effective than an email) -- tell him to defend our right to keep and bear arms by signing HB 436! |
June 29, 2013 #First_Name#, Two Hundred Thirty Seven years ago our forefathers, with great courage, told the king of the most powerful nation on Earth that they were severing their relationship and assuming the "separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them". They were no longer subjects to a despot, but were free citizens in whom "all political power is vested", as the Missouri Constitution also declares. The world would soon find out that they were committed to the prospect that all legitimate government derives its "just powers from the consent of the governed". With the signing of the Declaration of Independence, they became thirteen sovereign states, designed to better defend and preserve the unalienable rights bestowed upon them and their posterity by God Himself. Twelve years and a lot of sacrifice and bloodshed into their independence, those thirteen sovereign states entered into a second compact with one another when they each ratified what is our current Constitution. (See sidebar.) That compact made the federal government an agent of the states, and the states granted that agent few and defined powers, authority and jurisdiction. Having recently experienced a powerful and corrupt central government, guilty of despotic warrantless searches and curtailing free speech and press and even jury trials, the People of the several states weren't about to cede too much power. And the People certainly weren't going to give their new creation the power to disarm them! Like the Second Amendment, most of the Bill of Rights are designed to keep the Federal Government from becoming as despotic as the king whose grasp they had just thrown off. As an exclamation point to the Bill of Rights, the Tenth Amendment made it clear that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." That includes the power to defend the People's God-given right to keep and bear arms!
MISSOURI TAKES A STAND (Well, the General Assembly has.) With the passage of the Missouri Second Amendment Preservation Act (HB 436), our state General Assembly is reasserting the principles that made us the most free people on the planet. We are reclaiming the powers that have been usurped by a federal government that seems to have lost the Founder's vision. And, we are preempting what is a clear plan by some to disarm the American People. I wish I could say that Missouri is leading in this effort. Although we probably have the strongest and most principled defense of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Kansas, and now Alaska both beat us to the punch. Not only have their legislatures passed acts to preserve the Second Amendment, but their governors have already signed them into law! On the other hand, Missouri is waiting on Governor Jay Nixon to sign HB 436.
ACTION ITEM - Write Governor Nixon Today! The Missouri Constitution gives the governor 45 days after the official adjourning of the General Assembly -- he must either sign it, veto it, or do nothing and let it become law automatically. Governor Nixon has until July 14 to make a decision. Of course, he can veto it at ANY time. Good News: This report in the New American magazine cites a source in the governor's office as saying Nixon will not veto HB 436. In the world of politics, that provides little comfort, though. We need to help Governor Nixon decide to side with our right to keep and bear arms! In celebration of Independence Day this coming week, please do this one thing:
None of these letters need be long -- just a few sentences will make a huge impact -- much more than an email or even a phone call to the governor. We've come a long way and need one final push to reach our goal! For Liberty, - Ron
|
Hamilton on the Supremacy Clause “I maintain that the word supreme imports no more than this — that the Constitution, and laws made in pursuance thereof, cannot be controlled or defeated by any other law. The acts of the United States, therefore, will be absolutely obligatory as to all the proper objects and powers of the general government...but the laws of Congress are restricted to a certain sphere, and when they depart from this sphere, they are no longer supreme or binding” (emphasis added) (Alexander Hamilton, at New York’s ratifying convention).
|
To be removed from this distribution list, reply with "remove" in the subject line. |